Test result of .execute() ?

[nolio]

I think you don't need runasynctask or either put a reasonable pause inside the loop.
is there any reason you're using runasynctask?

It was just a try (a bad one;)) to reduce the usage of cpu, but with or without "runasynctask" the cpu is around 100%. 

Code: [Select]

parameter.WaitUpdatealready do a "pause" but i try to add one to test, but no more chance.

[bkenobi]

How do you monitor cpu usage?  I've used "top" but not sure if there's something better that's already included.  I haven't reviewed utilization, but it would probably be worth checking out to make sure my codes don't cause issues.

[nolio]

"top" is a good way. And i use the following program to have an history : http://www.homegenie.it/forum/index.php?topic=76.msg317#msg317

[nolio]

Hi,
@Gene, do you think there is a way to do without "charging" so much the cpu ?
Bye